Author Guidelines
Read the following sections before you submit your manuscript. These points help you prepare your work and understand how the journal evaluates submissions.
The Editorial Evaluation Process
Initial evaluation
The editorial team reviews every manuscript to check originality, relevance to the journal scope, and language quality. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements are returned without peer review.
Peer review
Each manuscript goes through a double-blind peer review with at least three reviewers. Reviewers provide specific comments that help you improve your work. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts across the following points:
Final decision
The editor reviews all comments and decides to accept or reject the manuscript. The editor may request an updated version when major improvements are needed.
Submission Guidelines
Word Paper Format
Manuscripts prepared in Word must follow the official journal format.
Formatting Guidelines
Use of AI-Assisting Tools
The journal allows responsible use of generative AI tools. Authors must follow the conditions below:
Non-compliance is treated as academic misconduct and may lead to withdrawal of published work.
Publication Ethics
Publication ethics policies are available in the Publication Policies section of the journal website.
Originality and Plagiarism
Submit only original work. Cite all material taken from other sources.
The journal uses iThenticate to check originality. The system generates a detailed report that highlights problematic sections and supports further improvement.